
In all human societies, power has always been regulated by a number of laws including the development and revision follow a special procedure, they define the constitution.
The Constitution is a body of law that defines the different institutions in the State and organizing their relations. It may also include a charter of fundamental rights. A written constitution is generally organized into several sections called Titles, which are divided into sections and subsections.
Whatever its form and content, the Constitution is considered the highest rule of the legal system of each country.
Some states, such as the United Kingdom, have no written constitution, which is the prevalent custom to organize relations between the institutions.
Others, like the United States have a Constitution that is in the form of a single text, with both the list of basic rights of citizens and the definition of the various powers.
Whatever its form and content, the Constitution is considered the highest rule of the legal system of each country.
Some states, such as the United Kingdom, have no written constitution, which is the prevalent custom to organize relations between the institutions.
Others, like the United States have a Constitution that is in the form of a single text, with both the list of basic rights of citizens and the definition of the various powers.
« Constitution first or the presidential elections? » this question occupies the Egyptian political scene for more than weeks and months. It’s one of the major discussions threads on the screens, in the street and in homes.
I believe that the constitution is primarily a logical step, the fall of the old regime and the collapse of its constitutional foundations. A new system must take its place, and its institutions and relationships between them must be based on a new constitution. This constitution must be written directly, rather than building institutions of the new order in accordance with constitutional rules of the old regime. Now that the constitution of 1971 has a new life, this would be equivalent to reviving the old regime.

It may seem that the current path or course is declared according to the will of the armed forces and the majority of Egyptians also, the army has to return the base as soon as possible and put the country back to an elected civilian authority, thus promoting the return of political stability and renewed production and development. Nevertheless, I believe that the current path and timetable threaten to lead the country towards a longer period of instability will delay the return of the army to the base and have negative consequences for the Egyptian economy.
The State that does not learn from its mistakes will never rise.
On the other hand, this question must be re-released now. Parliamentary elections are not subject of the question now, but the presidential election. We should not fall in the same error. Constitution before the presidential election should be severe. How to run "potential candidates" now without knowing what are the powers which will be in their hands after a year of their election? Is it possible to come head of the State of a presidential system, which has broad powers, it becomes months after his election as President of the State of its parliament, where the position of the president an honorary position, that is, to be more pronounced, where the President scenery? Is this sensible?!
Finally, personally I would demand for a constitution first the correct political path of democratic transition and deliver on its way logical and natural. It is the constitution; after all, that establishes the foundations of constitutional institutions, electoral systems and the relationship between them, not vice versa. For example the Tunisian revolution, in fact, continued this natural course, by starting training for a Constituent Assembly to draft a constitution which embodies the goals and aspirations of the revolution and which will regulate and organize the new governance system and its institutions. The same course was adopted by the revolutionary forces in Yemen as well. “The Tunisian and Yemeni putted the horse in its proper place, before the cart”.
Finally, personally I would demand for a constitution first the correct political path of democratic transition and deliver on its way logical and natural. It is the constitution; after all, that establishes the foundations of constitutional institutions, electoral systems and the relationship between them, not vice versa. For example the Tunisian revolution, in fact, continued this natural course, by starting training for a Constituent Assembly to draft a constitution which embodies the goals and aspirations of the revolution and which will regulate and organize the new governance system and its institutions. The same course was adopted by the revolutionary forces in Yemen as well. “The Tunisian and Yemeni putted the horse in its proper place, before the cart”.
The State that does not learn from its mistakes will never rise.
Constitution First !


